
Guidance on overreliance, parasocial attachment, and healthy usage patterns when using an AI tutor.
CurricuLLM is designed to support learning, not to replace the human relationships and independent thinking that underpin it. This section addresses the wellbeing risks specific to AI tutor interactions and how teachers and students can use the platform in healthy, productive ways.
CurricuLLM uses Socratic questioning to guide students toward their own understanding rather than handing them answers. This pedagogical design actively works against overreliance. However, it is still possible for students to fall into the habit of deferring to the AI — asking it before forming their own view, or accepting its framing without critical evaluation.
Teachers can help by:
Because CurricuLLM holds natural, responsive conversations, some students — particularly younger learners — may begin to perceive it as a person or develop an emotional connection to it. It is important for students to understand that the AI is software. It does not have feelings, it does not know them outside of the conversation, and it is not a substitute for relationships with teachers, friends, or family.
Teachers can reinforce this by:
Productive use of CurricuLLM involves focused, purposeful sessions rather than open-ended or compulsive use. Students should know that stepping away is not only acceptable but encouraged when they are:
We recommend that teachers set clear expectations about when and how CurricuLLM is used in class, and remind students that the best learning often comes from a combination of AI-assisted practice, classroom discussion, and independent thought.